Browse all
Subscribe to our blog
Sign up to receive the latest from our blog and customer case studies. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this post
Last Updated on
December 18, 2023

The 7 Most Popular Prioritization Frameworks for Product Managers

Published in

There are several prioritization frameworks that product managers can use to help them make decisions about which features to work on next. In this blog post, we will discuss some of the most popular frameworks and how they can be used to improve product development.

If you are looking for a way to organize your thoughts and make better decisions about what to work on next, we just might help you make a better decision today.

What is Product Prioritization in Product Management?

Product Prioritization in simple words is the activity of assessing and prioritizing the development of product features. The goal is to ensure that the product team is working on the right things, in the right order, to achieve the desired business outcomes.

In short, it’s all about making decisions that make the most impact, and deliver the most value to the customers, all while aligning with your product vision and mission and staying within the budget.

Product Prioritization: One of The Biggest Challenges for Product Managers

Product managers have a lot of responsibility, and one of the biggest challenges they face regularly is prioritizing the development of product features. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of potential features that could be added to a product at any point in time. How does a product manager know which ones will have the biggest impact on the business?

This is where product prioritization comes in. Using a prioritization framework, product managers can assess the impact of potential features and prioritize them accordingly.

Popular Prioritization Frameworks for Product Managers

Value vs. Complexity Quadrant

The Value vs. Complexity Quadrant is a popular framework for product managers. It can be used to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The quadrant is divided into four sections:

- High value, high complexity

- High value, low complexity

- Low value, high complexity

- Low value, low complexity

Features that are high value and high complexity are typically the most difficult to develop. However, they can also have the biggest impact on the business. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider these features before deciding whether or not to prioritize them.

Low-value, low-complexity features are typically not worth developing because they will have little impact on the business. However, there may be some exceptions to this rule. For example, if a low-value, low-complexity feature is pretty easy to develop, it might still be worth doing if it can help the product team learn more about the customer or the market.

High-value, low-complexity features are typically the most important for product managers to focus on. These are the features that will have the biggest impact on the business but are not too difficult to develop.

Low-value, high-complexity features should usually be avoided. These features will have little impact on the business and will be very difficult to develop. However, there may be some exceptions to this rule. For example, if a low-value, high-complexity feature is necessary for the product to meet a regulatory requirement, it may still be worth developing.

The Kano Model

The Kano Model is another popular prioritization framework used to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The model is divided into three categories:

- Must-haves

- Nice-to-haves

- Do not want

Must-have features are those that are necessary for the product to be successful. These are the features that customers will expect and will be disappointed if they are not included.

Nice-to-have features are those that would be nice to have but are not essential. These features may improve the product but they are not necessary for a product to be successful.

Do not want features are those that customers do not want and will not use. These features may make the product worse.

The Kano Model is a popular framework for product managers because it can help them assess the impact and complexity of potential features. Using this model, product managers can prioritize the development of features that are most important to the business and customers.

Weighted Scoring Prioritization

Weighted scoring is another popular prioritization framework. It can be used to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The framework assigns a weight to each criterion, such as customer need, business value, and technical feasibility. The weights are then used to calculate a score for each potential feature. The feature with the highest score is typically the one that should be developed first.

Weighted scoring is a popular framework for product managers because it can help them assess the impact and complexity of potential features. By using this framework, product managers can prioritize the development of features that are most important to the business and customers.

The RICE framework

The RICE framework is another popular prioritization framework used to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The RICE framework stands for Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort.

Reach is a measure of how many users will be affected by a feature.

Impact is a measure of how much of a difference the feature will make for users.

Confidence is a measure of how confident the product team is that the feature will be successful.

Effort is a measure of how much effort will be required to develop the feature.

ICE Scoring Model

The ICE Scoring Model is another popular prioritization framework. It is also widely used to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The ICE Scoring Model is similar to the RICE framework but with a few changes. The biggest change is that instead of using Confidence as a criterion, it uses Engagement.

Engagement is a measure of how interested and excited users are about a feature.

As a framework, ICE can help product managers assess the impact and complexity of potential features. By using this framework, product managers can prioritize the development of features that are most important to the business and customers.

The MoSCoW Method

The MoSCoW Method is another popular prioritization framework.

null

Source

The MoSCoW Method is a way of prioritizing features by dividing them into four categories:

- Must have

- Should have

- Could have

- Won't have

Must-have features are those that are necessary for the product to be successful. These are the features that customers will expect and will be disappointed if they are not included.

Should-have features are the ones that would be nice to have but are not essential. These features may improve the product but they are not necessary for it to be successful.

Could-have features are those that would be nice to have but are not essential. These features may improve the product but they will not make a significant difference.

Won't have features that customers do not want and will not use. These features may make the product worse.

Opportunity Scoring

Opportunity Scoring is another popular prioritization framework widely used by product managers to assess the impact and complexity of potential features.

null

Source

The Opportunity Scoring framework assigns a score to each potential feature based on three criteria: customer need, business value, and technical feasibility. The feature with the highest score is typically the one that should be developed first.

As a framework, opportunity scoring can assist in creating alignment between the product team and stakeholders. By using this framework, product managers can prioritize the development of features that are most important to the business and customers.

Benefits of Prioritization Frameworks

Increases the Success Rates of Strategic Projects

Using a prioritization framework, product managers can increase the chances that their strategic projects will be successful. While no framework is perfect, all of them can provide a structure and guidance that can help product managers make better decisions.

Reduces the Risk of Developing Features that are Not Used

Another benefit of using a prioritization framework is that it can reduce the risk of developing features that are not used. By using a framework, product managers can avoid developing features that are not important to the business or customers.

Increases the Alignment and Focus of Senior Management Teams Around Strategic Goals

Prioritization frameworks can also help increase the alignment and focus of senior management teams around strategic goals. By using a framework, product managers can ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goal.

Clears All Doubts for The Operational Teams when Faced with Decisions

Last but not the least, prioritization frameworks can also clear all doubts for the operational teams when they are faced with decisions. By using a framework, product managers can provide a clear and concise explanation of why certain features are being developed and others are not.

Prioritization frameworks can also help you make better decisions. By using a framework, product managers can avoid making decisions that are not in the best interest of the business or customers.

How to Choose the Best Prioritization Framework for The Team?

Now that we've gone over some of the most popular prioritization frameworks, it's time to choose the best one for your team.

When choosing a prioritization framework, there are a few things to keep in mind:

- What is the goal of the product?

- What are the objectives of the product?

- What are the most important factors to consider when prioritizing features?

- What is the team's process for making decisions?

- What is the team's culture?

By keeping these points in focus, you'll be able to choose the best prioritization framework for your team.

Wrapping up

Prioritization frameworks are a great way to help product managers make better decisions. By using a framework, product managers can avoid making decisions that are not in the best interest of the business or customers. When choosing a prioritization framework, there are a few things to keep in mind, such as the goal of the product and the objectives of the product.

If you know which framework to use but you’re not sure which tool you need to get the job done, check out FeedBear! We make it easy to collect, manage and store feedback and delight your customers. Sign up for a free trial today!

Collect customer feedback the easy way.

Bring feedback, ideas and feature requests in one place with FeedBear, so you can focus on what matters. Start your 14-day free trial today – no credit card required.
Start 14-Day Free Trial
No CC required. Cancel anytime.
Get a Demo
Capterra 4.8/5 stars of 22 reviews.Trustpilot 4.4/5 stars of 27 reviews.
Markup Hero feedback board.

Collect customer feedback the easy way.

Bring feedback, ideas and feature requests in one place with FeedBear, so you can focus on what matters. Start your 14-day free trial today – no credit card required.

Read more posts like this.

View all
View all